塞尔日甘斯布英雄人生
788
1.0
HD中字
塞尔日甘斯布英雄人生
1.0
更新时间:07月21日
主演:埃里克·埃尔莫斯尼诺,露西·高登,莱蒂西娅·卡斯塔,道格·琼斯,安娜·穆格拉利斯,米兰妮·让帕诺米,莎拉·弗里斯蒂,卡西·莫泰·克莱恩,勒兹万·瓦西莱斯库,蒂娜拉·卓卡洛娃,菲烈·卡特林,Deborah Grall,友兰达·梦露,欧菲莉亚·科尔布,克洛德·夏布洛尔,弗朗索瓦·莫雷尔,菲利普·杜克斯纳,格莱高利·嘉德波瓦,乔安·斯法,罗歇·莫利安,文森特·科隆布,Jean-Pierre Gos,Caroline Tillette,杰罗姆·察帕特,科洛·克莱沃,蒙特塞·里贝,达尼埃尔·伊索博,克洛伊·杜马斯,
简介:  法国一代歌王塞吉·甘斯布的传记片《歌王传》于19日在巴黎开拍,影片导演是以奇思妙想著称的漫画家尤安·史法。该片是好莱坞环球影业投拍的第一部法语对白电影,拍摄周期为13个星期,预定在2010年上映。《歌王传》是继《玫瑰人生》和《艺术先锋香奈尔》之后又一部备受瞩目的传记大片。影片将从二战期间巴黎街头一个名叫卢锡安·金斯布的犹太男孩讲起,展现他是如何在六十年代成为一代歌王以及他与当时的性感偶像碧姬·芭铎、简·伯金等人间的情感纠葛。甘斯布于1991年去世,他的女儿夏洛特·甘斯布也是目前人气很高的法国女演员。法国男星埃里克·埃尔莫斯尼诺将在片中扮演甘斯布,碧姬·芭铎由超级名模拉蒂迪亚·科斯塔出演,英国女孩露茜·高登被挑中再现简·伯金年轻时的绝代风情。此外,米兰妮·詹姆帕诺米饰演甘斯布生命中最后的伴侣Bambou,安娜·莫格拉莉丝与莎拉·弗里斯蒂分别饰演与他同时代的两位女歌手。史法表示在影片中真实与虚构将对半开,“这是一个寓言,我的甘斯布将是茂瑙的诺斯菲拉图和维托里奥·加斯曼式的意大利诱惑男子的结合体,甚至加上一点卓别林的温柔和诗意。”
726
2010
塞尔日甘斯布英雄人生
主演:埃里克·埃尔莫斯尼诺,露西·高登,莱蒂西娅·卡斯塔,道格·琼斯,安娜·穆格拉利斯,米兰妮·让帕诺米,莎拉·弗里斯蒂,卡西·莫泰·克莱恩,勒兹万·瓦西莱斯库,蒂娜拉·卓卡洛娃,菲烈·卡特林,Deborah Grall,友兰达·梦露,欧菲莉亚·科尔布,克洛德·夏布洛尔,弗朗索瓦·莫雷尔,菲利普·杜克斯纳,格莱高利·嘉德波瓦,乔安·斯法,罗歇·莫利安,文森特·科隆布,Jean-Pierre Gos,Caroline Tillette,杰罗姆·察帕特,科洛·克莱沃,蒙特塞·里贝,达尼埃尔·伊索博,克洛伊·杜马斯,
塞琳和朱莉出航记
783
1.0
更新HD
塞琳和朱莉出航记
1.0
更新时间:07月21日
主演:朱丽叶·贝尔托,多米尼克·拉布里埃,布鲁·欧吉尔,玛丽-弗朗丝·皮西尔,巴贝特·施罗德,Nathalie Asnar,玛丽-泰雷兹·索叙尔,菲利普·克利夫诺,安妮·扎米尔,让·杜歇,Adèle Taffetas,Monique Clément,Jér?me Richard,Michael Graham,Jean-Marie Sénia,Jean-Claude Biette,Jacques Bontemps,Michel Caen
简介:

朱莉(多米尼克·拉布里埃 Dominique Labourier 饰)是一名图书管理员,她的好朋友塞林(朱丽叶·贝尔托 Juliet Berto 饰)则是一名魔术师。这两个女孩之间的感情实在是太亲密了,从很久之前起,她们便开始分享两人所拥有的的一切,就连男友都是共享的。   一次偶然中,朱莉和塞林吃下了一颗有魔力的糖果,被传送到了一个光怪陆离的异世界中。在那里,两人同时爱上了一个名为奥利弗(巴贝特·施罗德 Barbet Schroeder 饰)的男人。奥利弗在早年间失去了妻子,身边只有一个重病的女儿,他曾经发过毒誓,在女儿痊愈之前,绝对不会娶第二个女人。于是,朱莉和塞林开始思考拯救小女孩的方法。

132
1974
塞琳和朱莉出航记
主演:朱丽叶·贝尔托,多米尼克·拉布里埃,布鲁·欧吉尔,玛丽-弗朗丝·皮西尔,巴贝特·施罗德,Nathalie Asnar,玛丽-泰雷兹·索叙尔,菲利普·克利夫诺,安妮·扎米尔,让·杜歇,Adèle Taffetas,Monique Clément,Jér?me Richard,Michael Graham,Jean-Marie Sénia,Jean-Claude Biette,Jacques Bontemps,Michel Caen
印度支那
780
4.0
正片
印度支那
4.0
更新时间:07月21日
主演:凯瑟琳·德纳芙,文森特·佩雷斯,范林丹,让·雅南,多米尼克·布隆,亨利·马尔托,杰拉德·拉缇戈,休伯特·圣-麦卡里,安德烈·瑟韦林,梅珠,朱雄,蒂博·德·蒙塔朗贝尔,埃里克·阮,郑盛,阮如琼,埃德加·吉夫里,光海
简介:法国占领越南的最后年代里,法国贵妇艾丽亚娜(凯瑟琳·德纳芙 Catherine Deneuve 饰)在越南南部经营橡胶园,她收养了父母双亡的越南公主卡米尔(范林丹 Linh Dan Pham 饰),两人相依生活。艾丽亚娜爱上年轻的越南殖民军海军军官詹·巴普蒂斯(文森特·佩雷斯 Vincent Perez 饰),但后来詹却与卡米尔陷入爱河。卡米尔誓死要嫁于詹,并离家出走追随詹去越南北方的龙岛。路途中,卡米尔因误杀一名法国军官遭到追杀,两人开始逃亡。途中,他们生下了儿子艾蒂安纳,最终两人被捕,儿子交予外祖母艾丽亚娜抚养。詹拒绝回国受审,愤慨自尽;卡米尔因大赦出狱,当艾丽亚娜前去接她回家时,卡米尔义无反顾地离开了这个家,成为一名坚定的越南民族独立共产党人。数年后,当艾蒂安纳再次见到作为越南代表团成员参加日内瓦谈判的母亲时,两人已然淡漠生分。  本片获第65届奥斯卡金像奖最佳外语片。
1264
1992
印度支那
主演:凯瑟琳·德纳芙,文森特·佩雷斯,范林丹,让·雅南,多米尼克·布隆,亨利·马尔托,杰拉德·拉缇戈,休伯特·圣-麦卡里,安德烈·瑟韦林,梅珠,朱雄,蒂博·德·蒙塔朗贝尔,埃里克·阮,郑盛,阮如琼,埃德加·吉夫里,光海
关于在短时间内的某几个人的经过
771
2.0
HD中字
关于在短时间内的某几个人的经过
2.0
更新时间:07月21日
主演:未知
简介:Voice 1 (male professional announcer type) This neighborhood(1) was made for the wretched dignity of the petty bourgeoisie, for respectable occupations and intellectual tourism. The sedentary population of the upper floors was sheltered from the influences of the street. This neighborhood has remained the same. It was the strange setting of our story, where a systematic questioning of all the diversions and works of a society, a total critique of its idea of happiness, was expressed in acts.  These people also scorned subjective profundity. They were interested in nothing but an adequate and concrete expression of themselves.  Voice 2 (Debord, monotone) Human beings are not fully conscious of their real life - usually groping in the dark; overwhelmed by the consequences of their acts; at every moment groups and individuals find themselves confronted with results they have not wished.  Voice 1 They said that oblivion was their ruling passion. They wanted to reinvent everything each day; to become the masters and possessors of their own lives.  Just as one does not judge a man according to the conception he has of himself, one cannot judge such periods of transition according to their own consciousness; on the contrary, one must explain the consciousness through the contradictions of material life, through the conflict between social conditions and the forces of social production.  The progress achieved in the domination of nature was not yet matched by a corresponding liberation of everyday life. Youth passed away among the various controls of resignation.  Our camera has captured for you a few aspects of a provisional microsociety.  The knowledge of empirical facts remains abstract and superficial as long as it is not concretized by its integration into the whole ” which alone permits the supersession of partial and abstract problems so as to arrive at their concrete essence, and implicitly at their meaning.  This group was on the margins of the economy. It tended toward a role of pure consumption, and first of all the free consumption of its time. It thus found itself directly engaged in qualitative variations of everyday life but deprived of any means to intervene in them.  The group ranged over a very small area. The same times brought them back to the same places. No one went to bed early. Discussion on the meaning of all this continued...  Voice 2 Our life is a journey ” In the winter and the night. ” We seek our passage...�  Voice 1 The abandoned literature nevertheless exerted a delaying action on new affective formulations.  Voice 2 There was the fatigue and the cold of the morning in this much-traversed labyrinth, like an enigma that we had to resolve. It was a looking-glass reality through which we had to discover the potential richness of reality.  On the bank of the river evening began once again; and caresses; and the importance of a world without importance. Just as the eyes have a blurred vision of many things and can see only one clearly, so the will can strive only incompletely toward diverse objects and can completely love only one at a time.  Voice 3 (young girl) No one counted on the future. It would never be possible to be together later, or anywhere else. There would never be a greater freedom.  Voice 1 The refusal of time and of growing old automatically limited encounters in this narrow, contingent zone, where what was lacking was felt as irreparable. The extreme precariousness of the means of getting by without working was at the root of this impatience which made excesses necessary and breaks definitive.  Voice 2 One never really contests an organization of existence without contesting all of that organization's forms of language.  Voice 1 When freedom is practiced in a closed circle, it fades into a dream, becomes a mere representation of itself. The ambiance of play is by nature unstable. At any moment ordinary life� can prevail once again. The geographical limitation of play is even more striking than its temporal limitation. Any game takes place within the contours of its spatial domain. Around the neighborhood, around its fleeting and threatened immobility, stretched a half-known city where people met only by chance, losing their way forever.  The girls who found their way there, because they were legally under the control of their families until the age of eighteen, were often recaptured by the defenders of that detestable institution. They were generally confined under the guard of those creatures who among all the bad products of a bad society are the most ugly and repugnant nuns.  What usually makes documentaries so easy to understand is the arbitrary limitation of their subject matter. They describe the atomization of social functions and the isolation of their products. One can, in contrast, envisage the entire complexity of a moment which is not resolved into a work, a moment whose movement indissolubly contains facts and values and whose meaning does not yet appear. The subject matter of the documentary would then be this confused totality.  Voice 2 The era had arrived at a level of knowledge and technical means that made possible, and increasingly necessary, a direct construction of all aspects of a liberated affective and practical existence. The appearance of these superior means of action, still unused because of the delays in the project of liquidating the commodity economy, had already condemned aesthetic activity, whose ambitions and powers were both outdated. The decay of art and of all the values of former mores had formed our sociological background. The ruling class's monopoly over the instruments we needed to control in order to realize the collective art of our time had excluded us from a cultural production officially devoted to illustrating and repeating the past. An art film on this generation can only be a film on its absence of real creations.  Everyone unthinkingly followed the paths learned once and for all, to their work and their home, to their predictable future. For them duty had already become a habit, and habit a duty. They did not see the deficiency of their city. They thought the deficiency of their life was natural. We wanted to break out of this conditioning, in quest of another use of the urban landscape, in quest of new passions. The atmosphere of a few places gave us intimations of the future powers of an architecture it would be necessary to create to be the support and framework for less mediocre games. We could expect nothing of anything we had not ourselves altered. The urban environment proclaimed the orders and tastes of the ruling society just as violently as the newspapers. It is man who makes the unity of the world, but man has extended himself everywhere. People can see nothing around them that is not their own image; everything speaks to them of themselves. Their very landscape is alive. There were obstacles everywhere. There was a cohesion in the obstacles of all types. They maintained the coherent reign of poverty. Everything being connected, it was necessary to change everything by a unitary struggle, or nothing. It was necessary to link up with the masses, but we were surrounded by sleep.  Voice 3 The dictatorship of the proletariat is a desperate struggle, bloody and bloodless, violent and peaceful, military and economic, educational and administrative, against the forces and traditions of the old world.  Voice 1 In this country it is once again the men of order who have rebelled. They have reinforced their power. They have been able to aggravate the grotesqueness of the ruling conditions according to their will. They have embellished their system with the funereal ceremonies of the past.  Voice 2 Years, like a single instant prolonged to this point, come to an end.  Voice 1 What was directly lived reappears frozen in the distance, fit into the tastes and illusions of an era, carried away with it.  Voice 2 The appearance of events that we have not made, that others have made against us, now obliges us to be aware of the passage of time, its results, the transformation of our own desires into events. What differentiates the past from the present is precisely its out-of-reach objectivity; there is no more should-be; being is so consumed that it has ceased to exist. The details are already lost in the dust of time. Who was afraid of life, afraid of the night, afraid of being taken, afraid of being kept  Voice 3 What should be abolished continues, and we continue to wear away with it. We are engulfed. We are separated. The years pass and we haven't changed anything.  Voice 2 Once again morning in the same streets. Once again the fatigue of so many similarly passed nights. It is a walk that has lasted a long time.  Voice 1 Really hard to drink more.  Voice 2 Of course one might make a film of it. But even if such a film succeeds in being as fundamentally disconnected and unsatisfying as the reality it deals with, it will never be more than a re-creation ” poor and false like this botched traveling shot.  Voice 3 There are now people who pride themselves on being authors of films, as others were authors of novels. They are even more backward than the novelists because they are unaware of the decomposition and exhaustion of individual expression in our time, ignorant of the end of the arts of passivity. They are praised for their sincerity since they dramatize, with more personal depth, the conventions of which their life consists. There is talk of the liberation of the cinema. But what does it matter to us if one more art is liberated through which Tom, Dick or Harry can joyously express their slavish sentiments The only interesting venture is the liberation of everyday life, not only in the perspectives of history but for us and right away. This entails the withering away of alienated forms of communication. The cinema, too, has to be destroyed.  Voice 2 In the final analysis, stars are created by the need we have for them, and not by their talent or lack of talent or even by the film industry or advertising. Miserable need, dismal, anonymous life that would like to expand itself to the dimensions of cinema life. The imaginary life on the screen is the product of this real need. The star is the projection of this need.  The images of the advertisements during the intermissions are more suited than any others for evoking an intermission of life.  To really describe this era it would no doubt be necessary to show many other things. But what would be the point  Better to grasp the totality of what has been done and what remains to be done than to add more ruins to the old world of the spectacle and of memories.  1. This film, which evokes the lettrist experiences at the origin of the situationist movement, opens with shots of the Paris district frequented by the lettrists in the early 1950s.
1054
1959
关于在短时间内的某几个人的经过
主演:
再见我的王后
762
6.0
HD中字
再见我的王后
6.0
更新时间:07月21日
主演:蕾雅·赛杜,黛安·克鲁格,维吉妮·拉朵嫣,诺埃米·洛夫斯基,泽维尔·布瓦,米歇尔·罗班,茱莉-玛丽·帕芒提耶,洛丽塔·夏马,玛莎·科夫曼,弗拉基米尔·康斯金尼,多米尼克·雷蒙,安妮·波努瓦,埃尔韦·皮埃尔,阿拉丁·瑞贝尔,雅各·诺勒
简介:  故事发生在1789年的法国凡尔赛宫,革命的热潮席卷了整个国家,居住在宫中的王公贵族们成为了革命者们攻击的对象。为了保命,很多人决定逃跑,可是皇后玛丽(黛安·克鲁格 Diane Kruger 饰)却无法放下她高贵的尊严。长久以来,波利内公爵夫人(维吉妮·拉朵嫣 Virgi nie Ledoyen 饰)和玛丽皇后保持了暧昧而又亲密的关系,而这一次,保全波利内公爵夫人的性命则成为了玛丽皇后首当其冲需要解决的问题。
  西朵妮(蕾雅·赛杜 Léa Seydoux 饰)只是一介小小侍女,但她对玛丽皇后的忠臣和爱慕是任何人都无法相比的,即使到了这个紧要关头,她依然希望能够守在玛丽皇后的身边,为她卖命。于是,西朵妮顺理成章的成为了玛丽皇后手中的棋子,而她并不知道,自己将要面临的是怎样的命运。
96
2012
再见我的王后
主演:蕾雅·赛杜,黛安·克鲁格,维吉妮·拉朵嫣,诺埃米·洛夫斯基,泽维尔·布瓦,米歇尔·罗班,茱莉-玛丽·帕芒提耶,洛丽塔·夏马,玛莎·科夫曼,弗拉基米尔·康斯金尼,多米尼克·雷蒙,安妮·波努瓦,埃尔韦·皮埃尔,阿拉丁·瑞贝尔,雅各·诺勒